179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Christopher Fahey
To:
'GD' , 'idm@hyperreal.com'
Date:
Mon, 9 Jun 1997 13:08:50 -0400
Subject:
RE: (idm) SP vs D&B (was anti-idm)
Msg-Id:
<01BC74DA.268C1B20@ip76.an17-new-york4.ny.pub-ip.psi.net>
Mbox:
idm.9706.gz
I agree completely with this. Why does everyone dis amp for not doing a slick beat-matching mix? If they did that they would only play one style of music. And probably only really bad videos too. I think some artists purposefully try to make music that fits into a mix with other formulaic tunes just so it won't be hard for the average DJ to make a transition into their song. If your song is atypical (like laika using 7/8 time signatures) you might not even get into a mix. Hell, I think Drum and Bass is just Drums and Basses because if they had melodies they would be hard to mix (matching pitch and key from song to song is easier when there is almost no tonality to the song, just boom chit ba-boom chititititcckckboom.) -Chris Fahey -----Original Message----- From: GD [SMTP:g-d@worldnet.att.net] I can't really relate to this "blending" style of playing music. I don't see anything wrong with spinning two totally different styles of tunes back to back, even not beat matched, as long as the transition is handled properly. In fact, it's boring to hear a bunch of similar-sounding tunes all mixed together; I'd rather have some variety in the selection. GD